|
2008 Election 
Sun Jun 29, 2008 at 00:15:51 AM PDT
|
( - promoted by kid oakland)
Thirty-three states have U.S. Senate seats up for election in 2008. And anyone following the news over the last year-and-a-half has read about Senate Republicans filibustering anything and everything that moves, breaking the record for filibusters in a two-year Congressional session in less than one year!
It is critical that we expand our majority in the U.S. Senate to reduce this historic rate of Republican obstructionism, so that an Obama administration can proceed with an agenda that helps rather than hinders American progress. I have been following this on my blog, Senate Guru, very closely and have been pushing for us to expand the map of competitive Senate races.
To that end, I have established the Expand the Map! ActBlue page, raising much needed funds for Democratic Senate candidates in uphill but competitive (or very-close-to-competitive) Senate races. Every one of these Democratic Senate candidates who wins her or his race means one less Republican filibustering progressive legislation. And every one of these Democratic Senate candidates has a message that will resonate with voters - all they need are the resources to get their messages out to the electorate and prevent the Republican incumbents from muddying their records.
With Monday night being the deadline for the second fundraising quarter of 2008, it is critical that we get funds in to help these Democratic candidates show strength. So, please, please, please contribute if you can to any of the terrific candidates for Senate on the Expand the Map! ActBlue page. Even though these candidates don't represent your state, if elected, they will defeat the Republican obstructionism that very much impacts you and your state.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Sun Sep 02, 2007 at 13:43:13 PM PDT
|
|
Everybody is going a bit crazy about the fight between the DNC and the FDP over the seating of delegates at the national convention. There's a lot more to say about this at other times and for other reasons. But one aspect of the debate is somewhat overdone. The claim that our votes won't be counted doesn't make much sense. The fact is, no state's delegates "count" at the convention. The only influence that a state has in the election process is by determining who the front-runner will be during the early part of the electoral cycle. Florida will have a huge impact on that on January 29, regardless of whether or not our votes are official that day. But, by the time the convention comes around, the vote for the nomination will have been long determined and 200 votes will have no impact on the outcome. They never have. The results at conventions going back to 1936 make this clear. In 1936 (and earlier) a candidate had to win 2/3rds of convention delegates to win the Democratic nomination. Since then, the rules have required only a majority and at no convention since then would 200 votes make a difference in the outcome:
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 484 words in story)
|
|
|
|
|
|
